For example, sex otherwise politics were especially mutual by one to meme nearest and dearest per

Using Humour to Flirt Efficiently
May 19, 2023
2023: Diese besten Homepages um physikalische Sexkontakt & Sexdates aufstobern
May 19, 2023

For example, sex otherwise politics were especially mutual by one to meme nearest and dearest per

A more systematic analysis of the families’ cohesiveness based on T-Tests for the mean differences between generic attributes within and outside a meme families reaffirmed this tendency. We found significantly more common attributes between bbw rencontres mûres meme instances from the same family. In general, each instance shared more attributes with other family members (3.49) than with nonfamily members (2.39), T(18865) = , p < .01. This similarity between instances of the same family is significant in terms of content (T(6534) = , p < .01), participants (T(12755) = , p < .01), and form (T(16379) = 41.2, p < .01).

Yet, while looking alone from the blogs, contribution, and function features, there are of numerous household which have nonsignificant differences between the latest mean internal and you can external well-known qualities. This was especially true on content feature. Just twelve of 50 meme family shared more stuff features in nearest and dearest. This means that, articles features was basically quicker cohesive in the most common meme parents. On top of that, during the parents was basically blogs was discovered to be much more cohesive, it actually was together with far more unique and distinctive.

Furthermore, very meme group had men in addition to teenager and you will more youthful adult people because their preferred have. Almost every other age range, such as for instance the elderly, people, kids, and kids and people, famous people, and particularly creature users was indeed more distinctive to particular meme parents. Fundamentally, with respect to function, extremely meme group used quick image with text message or films. Meme family members where means are way more natural shared remix and you will graphic control plus acronyms and you may wordplay.

The brand new association anywhere between cohesiveness and you can individuality

The cohesiveness of meme families around more unique generic attributes already provided a partial answer to RQ4, regarding the link between cohesiveness and uniqueness in meme families, and a Pearson correlation between the two revealed a very strong and significant positive correlation (r = .911, p < .001). In other words, the more unique the shared attributes within a meme family, the higher the difference between shared attributes within and outside a meme family. When looking at each group of attributes separately, it was mainly the uniqueness of form (r = .870, p < .001) and content (r = .726, p < .001) attributes that positively correlated with family cohesiveness. The uniqueness of participation attributes had a weaker correlation with family cohesiveness (r = .366, p < .01).

Quiddities, concreteness, uniqueness, and you can cohesiveness

In response to the last research question, we found a significant positive correlation between quiddity concreteness and both the cohesiveness (r = .363, p < .01) and uniqueness (r = .431, p < .01) of Internet memes. In other words, a meme family with a more concrete quiddity was also more cohesive and unique in its generic attributes.

In particular, a significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of instances in a meme family sharing a similar object and the cohesiveness (r = .286, p < .05) and uniqueness (r = .349, p < .05) of their content. This suggests that instances of meme families in which the quiddity is a specific object tend also to deal with the same unique themes. Thus, for example, instances of the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” family always included this specific character or object, and many of them also contained references to religion, which is a unique theme in the memetic sphere.

Meme families in which the quiddity is a character, such as “Charlie the Unicorn,” are more cohesive, but also unique in terms of participation. This is typically reflected in a higher percentage of instances containing animal participants. Perhaps less obvious is the negative correlation between action and uniqueness of participation (r = ?.329, p < .05). This means that the participants in meme families in which the main quiddity is an action are not unique, but rather part of the mainstream. Thus, for example, most participants of “Caramelldansen,” “The Evolution of Dance,” or “Planking” are teens or young adults.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *